News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on C++17 creates a practical use of the backward array index operator. Parent comment

Re:C++17 creates a practical use of the backward array index... by addaon on Monday April 03, 2023 @09:45PM (#35433912)
But both C and C++ are comfortable with *(foo() + bar()) having undefined evaluation order, so foo()[bar()] potentially having order-dependent results is clearly not sufficient reason for this decision...
[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.