News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$60/MWh for advanced nuclear electricity is achievable: G... by rainsford on Monday April 03, 2023 @06:35PM (#35432270)
> However our laws are backwards: regulators are required to increase safety standards for nuclear so long as it is cheaper, until the costs are brought up to par with other energy sources.

Any citation for that? It's a convenient villain to blame, but absent any proof regulators are deliberately trying to make nuclear less competitive, it seems much more plausible that regulations are driven by concern over accidents. If a wind turbine fails it doesn't make the entire region uninhabitable for decades.

[dead]
Re:$60/MWh for advanced nuclear electricity is achievable: G... by adastra22 on Monday April 03, 2023 @09:52PM (#35433954)
Re:$60/MWh for advanced nuclear electricity is achievable: G... by richk449 on Monday April 03, 2023 @09:30PM (#35433813)
It’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s just the way some of the nuclear regulations are written. Operators are required to achieve radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable.

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/alara.html