Any rational person reading your response is going to assume you either didn't read what I said, or worse were using malign influence tactics to push something that 'wasn't said' as 'something that was said' (as a troll would).
Notably, I never said it was everywhere, in fact I said the opposite (if you go back and review). You left an important sentence out of my quoted response.
We want to keep discussions clean, if you have something to add make sure to keep it accurate. Cherry-picking and putting words in other people's mouth isn't an acceptable form of rational discourse.
We don't want people reading this misunderstanding your intent or what you are trying to communicate.
Everyone knows almost nothing happens everywhere. Its why the first thing they teach in argumentation, debate, and logic is to never use absolute language like 'all' and 'every' unless you know its absolute (and can't be misinterpreted).
Miscommunications happen, hopefully you understand how it happened now and will be more careful moving forward.
> > > The police are liable if they don't follow-up on the report
> > Since when?
> Its what the courts in many areas have generally ruled.
Really, if you want to insist that this was what you were saying the entire time, either start with it or acknowledge that you failed to start with it. Indeed, miscommunications happen. Consider that you come across as unwilling to believe your part in this happening.
Likewise, I hope you can see how you erred so that you may do better in the future.
That is certainly not the case everywhere, least of all the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_of_Castle_Rock_v._Gonzale....
> Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failing to enforce a restraining order, which had led to the murders of a woman's three children by her estranged husband.