News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal earthquake for AI. Parent comment

Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by GaggiX on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:47AM (#35424529)
So, reading your comment, I can infer that the main problem is not the fact that the AI was trained on copyrighted data, but the fact that its performance outperforms that of a human artist.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by blibble on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:48AM (#35424548)
no, that's just my rhetorical response to a stupid hypothetical argument
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by GaggiX on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:05AM (#35424892)
But the question was not so stupid as it underlines the actual problem of AI, the scale on which it operates, not the fact that a machine could learn similarly to a human. I found the question pretty clever.
[ Parent | on HN ]