Re:
by programmer_dude on Monday April 03, 2023 @08:08AM
(#35422115)
The presence of a creator does not change anything. Who created the creator?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That’s the point - something completely beyond our notions of causality or the arrow of time has to be at the foundation of it.
Re:
by NayamAmarshe on Monday April 03, 2023 @09:39AM
(#35423367)
The creator remains without a creation. The notion that most schools of thought have is, the creator is unborn and born at the same time and has always existed. Creator does not have a point of creation, not even death because those rules only apply to the materialistic universe.
Re:
by programmer_dude on Monday April 03, 2023 @11:27AM
(#35425363)
That's quite a cop out. Excuse me if I don't take your word for it.
It isn't a cop out because the creator in the conclusion of this type of argument (e.g. Aquinas' third way) is not just another contingent being like other things, but rather a being whose existence is necessary in itself.
Re:
by NayamAmarshe on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @02:46AM
(#35435966)
> Aquinas' third way
Thank you! This was very interesting to read about. Learned something new today :D