The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by TaylorAlexander on Saturday April 01, 2023 @05:56PM (#35404504)

Sure but in my country (USA) the government is hopelessly inept at regulating technology. We still don’t have privacy regulations and now to work around this they’re trying to ban specific foreign apps instead of protecting us from all apps! I’d honestly be horrified if they tried to regulate AI. They would be in bed with Facebook and Microsoft and they’d somehow write legislation that only serves to insulate those companies from legal repercussions instead of doing anything to protect regular people. As far as I can tell it is the view of congress that big tech can to whatever they want to us as long as the government gets a piece.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by alex_sf on Saturday April 01, 2023 @06:39PM (#35404885)

There is no government that isn't hopeless inept at regulating technology.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by DubiousPusher on Saturday April 01, 2023 @06:28PM (#35404783)

Agreed. The US has backslidden since the 20th century back towards an elitest Republic and away from democracy. But even in the US, collective action has a better track record than "altruism".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by TaylorAlexander on Saturday April 01, 2023 @06:34PM (#35404833)

Sometimes I wonder if the back slide narrative is really accurate, or if we’re looking back at the myth of history rather than the facts. When the country was founded, only white men could vote and people of color were legally property with no rights. That’s obviously not democracy, so I question at what point after that but before today we really had democracy to have slid back from.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by bugglebeetle on Saturday April 01, 2023 @06:49PM (#35404963)

When we realize it’s really only about from the 1970s that we had full enfranchisement and political participation of all citizens, this becomes more obvious. “Coincidentally,” this enfranchisement was followed by the Volker shock and then the Reagan administration, both of which led to the decimation of labor’s political power and share of the economic pie.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by DubiousPusher on Saturday April 01, 2023 @07:11PM (#35405125)

Think of democracy as multivariate. One variable is the percentage of the population that are enfranchised. The other is how responsive the political, legal and economic systems are to the needs of everyday people.

America started as an elitest Republic. Slowly, variable #1 grew and shrank in fits in starts but variable #2 changed very little. Until we get to the 1930s and then variable #2 explodes wide open. Then in 1960s variable #1 breaks wide open as well.

By the 70s we are probably at the high point of both. Since then #1 has significantly eroded. And now with the court punches at the voting rights act #2 is now under threat as well.

I don't mean it in the usual internet guy sense. I don't see America as having a pure past. I believe America was an elitest Republic with very slow steps towards democracy. To me America only turned the corner towards becoming a democracy in the 1930s. It was a bumpy up and down from there with a slump in the last 40 years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Contradictions of Sam Altman, AI Crusader by IOT_Apprentice on Saturday April 01, 2023 @09:08PM (#35406010)

Congress is already in bed with Meta, who is driving legislating away their competition (TikTok) or taking over the US version. Political donations aside, it should be illegal for congress to due insider trading or investing in companies.

[ Parent | on HN ]