>I get paid to solve business problems
That's far more pretentious than any of the things you listed.
Re:Programming Isn’t Coding
by irrational on Saturday April 01, 2023 @12:04AM
(#35396994)
How is it pretentious? I feel the same way. When people ask me what programming is like, I tell them it is 50% understanding the business problem, 49% problem solving, and 1% writing code.
Because first, it's trite: literally every person in the organization is hired to "solve business problems". Second, I think it's pompous to elevate one's position to some sort of strategic "problem solver" role when, unless you are a consultant, you are hired to translate requirements into working software systems. Your boss would roll her eyes at the "I solve business problems" language. She would say, "Uh-huh. You do that - solve the business's problems. Just make sure you close your Jira tickets while you're doing it."
"translate requirements into working software systems" demonstrates fundamental misunderstanding what programmers do. It is a decades old and rather common misconception. It is why there is "mythical" in the Mythical man-month book (1975).
Re:Programming Isn’t Coding
by mechanical_bear on Saturday April 01, 2023 @12:14AM
(#35397053)
That’s literally what it is though.
Re:Programming Isn’t Coding
by WinnieRallycar on Saturday April 01, 2023 @12:02AM
(#35396980)
I wouldn’t say so. In essence, every employee is paid to solve business problems.
The taxonomy is missing "designing," "architecting," "crafting," and more things people like to say they do. To feel important. More important than someone(s) else.
And I often call myself a "professional typist" because the whole taxonomy is pompous BS.
I get paid to solve business problems.