News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Twitter Algorithm. Parent comment

Re:The Twitter Algorithm by delecti on Friday March 31, 2023 @05:00PM (#35393595)
Chesterton's Fence. In a sufficiently large system, you should be hesitant to remove things unless you're sure you know why it was added, and all the things that have come to depend on it since.

I've definitely been hesitant to remove things I was pretty confident weren't used anymore, just because I didn't want to deal with the repercussions if I was wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Twitter Algorithm by nonethewiser on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:37PM (#35395746)
I didn’t know there was a name for this. Thanks for sharing.

I’ve definitely been bitten by this. You always have to weigh the chance you break something against the upside. If you’re actually fixing a bug, fine. But just refactoring to make something cleaner? Or deleting because it seems like it’s not doing anything, even after doing some research? Think again.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Twitter Algorithm by djtango on Saturday April 01, 2023 @04:20AM (#35398364)
True for many things - doctors are now a lot more hesitant to remove the appendix for example. (it serves as a buffer for your gut flora iirc)
[ Parent | on HN ]