Re:Why not tell people to “simply” use pyenv, poetry or anac...
by davidjfelix on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:11PM
(#35390955)
What's your perfect Sunday?
Re:Why not tell people to “simply” use pyenv, poetry or anac...
by oconnor663 on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:20PM
(#35391112)
How do you see this advice changing in 3-5 years?
Re:Why not tell people to “simply” use pyenv, poetry or anac...
by BiteCode_dev on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @05:59AM
(#35437308)
This procedure was valid 5 years ago, and all the alternatives have changed a lot in the same time period.
So if I had to chose one way for the next decade, I would bet on this.
But I will not pretend we can be sure about anything on this matter.
In fact, my hope is that we can improve the process tremendously by creating an unified way of bootstrapping Python for all OS. If this ever happens, the procedure would become mostly obsolete.
At the end of the week I will write about this, and the various experiments the community have done so far in that regard.
Re:Why not tell people to “simply” use pyenv, poetry or anac...
by vqbd on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:47PM
(#35396548)
There's a version of pyenv for windows called pyenv-win. The cli installs as `pyenv` and the commands are the same. So not game over imo.
Also, [even if it did], it installs binaries and doesn't compile.
Re:Why not tell people to “simply” use pyenv, poetry or anac...
by BiteCode_dev on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @05:54AM
(#35437267)
You are not telling them to use pyenv, you are telling them to use a totally different tool that happen to have a similar name and provide a similar interface.
You have already lost.
I'm late to the party but AMA :)