News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by Spooky23 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @10:35PM (#35381751)
A grand jury sat and apparently found charges to be warranted.

It’s funny, Republicans used to often wax in about the sanctity of the rule of law. For some reason, the entrancing powers of Mr. Trump led many to throw that away to stand behind the demagogue.

We should demand better. I live in New York. 2/4 most recent governors left office as part of a deal to avoid prosecution. Prominent legislative leaders were convicted and removed from office.

Regardless of party, there needs to be a standard. Breaking the law and laundering money to buy the silence of a sexual dalliance is a serious crime. Former NY Governor Spitzer was facing federal charges for money transfer violations of his own money to solicit an escort.

Mr Trump seeks to make this a political matter because that distracts from the heart of the matter — his actions. The people who in good faith donated to his campaign wanted to “make America great again”, not pay hush money to porn actresses.

Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by giardini on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:40AM (#35382658)
Spooky23 says >"A grand jury sat and apparently found charges to be warranted."<

As New York Judge Sol Wachtler said in 1985, “If a district attorney wanted, a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.”

Explanation at https://abovethelaw.com/2016/02/criminally-yours-indicting-a...

Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump by Spooky23 on Friday March 31, 2023 @09:14AM (#35386651)
That actually came from a case called ABSCAM in the 70s and 80s. ABSCAM was a case where the FBI ran a sting (or entrapment depending on your POV) that ensnared and convicted of bribery about 30 people, including a dozen politicians... a half dozen members of the house and a US Senator.