News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT. Parent comment

Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by jfk13 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @06:11PM (#35379504)
If content with a "human-generated" flag is rated more highly in some way -- e.g. search results -- then of course spammers will automatically add that flag to their AI-generated garbage. How do you propose to prevent them?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by notahacker on Thursday March 30, 2023 @06:37PM (#35379807)
I assume, like the actual meta generator tags, it wouldn't actually be a massive boon for regular search results
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT by groestl on Thursday March 30, 2023 @09:50PM (#35381373)
And if it's not: why bother.
[ Parent | on HN ]