Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT
by paxys on Thursday March 30, 2023 @01:05PM
(#35375891)
And what about the terms of service of my blog or code repository? Does OpenAI respect that?
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT
by dragonwriter on Thursday March 30, 2023 @01:07PM
(#35375915)
> And what about the terms of service of my blog or code repository? Does OpenAI respect that?
Seems to me that’s an issue between you and OpenAI. (Does your blog or code repository actually have published restrictive terms of service? Did it when OpenAI accessed it? Did OpenAI even access it?)
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT
by deckard1 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @03:00PM
(#35377426)
You think OpenAI is going to care unless you have a team of expensive lawyers to back you up?
Microsoft is out there laundering GPL code with Copilot. These companies live firmly in the don't give a fuck region of capitalism. Copyright law for thee, not for me.
Re:Google trained Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT
by magicalist on Thursday March 30, 2023 @01:21PM
(#35376122)
Since it was through ShareGPT, is the argument like "what color are your bits" but for ToS?
Maybe if they had put in their terms of service "you can only share this on sites with their own ToS that allow sharing but disallow using the content for training models, and also replicate this requirement", I don't see how you could have any sort of viral ToS like that.
Seems more like it's just a bad idea to rely heavily on another LLM's output for training.
I think the argument here is over the OpenAI Terms of Service, not copyright.