Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by paxys on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @10:44PM
(#35351606)
Technological progress automating away work to the extent that we don't have to all slog for 40-80 hours a week just to be able to afford food and shelter is a wonderful thing. So don't blame AI, but instead the social and economic systems we have created that cannot accept this reality.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by symlinkk on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @11:08PM
(#35351799)
You’re relying on the hope that the people with money and power would be willing to share that with everyone else. They wouldn’t. Our entire economic system is based on the principle that people are inherently selfish.
Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by paxys on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @11:12PM
(#35351833)
Which is what I'm saying. Technological progress will happen whether we like it or not. If we want to continue to be able to afford food, rather than ranting against AI and calling for its ban we need to instead work to fix the economic system so AI can be used for good. Relying on the charity of corporations for basic survival was always a bad idea.
Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by symlinkk on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @12:17AM
(#35352469)
The economic system isn’t the problem. Human nature is the problem. And it’s immutable.
Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by jleyank on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @10:52PM
(#35351679)
Unless there’s something like UBI, where’s that food coming from if you’re not working the hours?
Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by paxys on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @10:55PM
(#35351707)
The AI is working the hours. That's the entire point.
Re:AI could replace equivalent of 300M jobs – report
by wolpoli on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @11:14PM
(#35351847)
A human will unfortunately need do it, because Agricultural Equipment Operators have no exposed tasks to LLMs [0]. We'll need other AI advancements.