Microsoft's Software Is Malware

Re:Microsoft's Software Is Malware by agiacalone on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @05:20PM (#35348051)

Shouldn't the credit go to VisiCalc instead of Excel?

Excel rode on the popularity of VisiCalc and Lotus 123 for years.

https://thehistoryofcomputing.net/visicalc-excel-and-the-ris...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft's Software Is Malware by alexvoda on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @05:34PM (#35348235)

And while Lotus may have declined in part due to poor strategic decisions, Microsoft is known to have engaged in anti-competitive practices against WordPerfect in the same period.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft's Software Is Malware by ThrowawayB7 on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @07:12PM (#35349419)

Kind of tangential but the article talks about VisiCalc, Lotus 1-2-3, and Excel but somehow fails to mention Microsoft's Multiplan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplan) which was released the year before Lotus 1-2-3 came out. Granted, it wasn't that popular or successful, but it shows that, contrary to what some seem to think, Microsoft was contending in the spreadsheet arena long, long before Excel was even a glimmer on the horizon.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Microsoft's Software Is Malware by agiacalone on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @07:23PM (#35349526)

From the article:

“They released an early spreadsheet tool called Multiple [sic] in 1982. But Lotus 1-2-3 was the first killer application for the PC.”

[ Parent | on HN ]