> It's crazy Apple considered it better to write a completely new app rather than improve their existing product.
That's why they didn't, they bought a service and rebranded it.
https://www.apple.com/hk/en/newsroom/2021/08/apple-acquires-...
Re:Apple Music Classical
by treerunner on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @07:10AM
(#35338800)
That’s even more crazy.
Patching one app into another for improved UX and categorization is bonkers.
Also, my kid wanted to use Apple Music classical first thing this morning (he’s a big classical music nut), you literally have to be logged in to regular Apple Music before Classical will allow you to play anything. Weird.
I don‘t think they „patched“ stuff. Without knowing much about it I‘d guess they just took the backend, put it behind an Apple API and then built a new app based on that. The frontend there is probably the easier part and likely the reason it‘s only available on iOS at this point.
You have to be logged into Apple Music before you can play Apple Music, regardless of whether you're using the Music app, the Classical app, or the web app. I'm not sure what's weird about that?
Oh, are you saying you can't log in using the Classical app, but have to use the other one? That would be weird.
It's crazy Apple considered it better to write a completely new app rather than improve their existing product.