News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies. Parent comment

Re:The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic s... by cafeinux on Monday March 27, 2023 @07:45AM (#35325426)
The richer would be the ones that do things on their livefeed that attract people. Do you want politicians orgies? Because that's how you get politicians orgies. The poorer politicians would be the perfectly honest and completely boring ones, not a great way to encourage honesty.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic s... by bbarnett on Monday March 27, 2023 @08:54AM (#35326054)
Do you want politicians orgies?

Now wait, let not be too hasty here. We should whiteboard this out. There are a lot of moving parts, and shutting down an idea too soon, would be wrong.

So to start, uh, just wondering, which politicians? Also, what would they be wearing?

Again, only asking for an accurate framing here.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic s... by mikrotikker on Monday March 27, 2023 @09:14AM (#35326284)
Lauren Boebert is secretly a total hottie. But I really wanna see Mitch McConnell shake what he got.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic s... by Loughla on Monday March 27, 2023 @09:27AM (#35326422)
I know that HN isn't supposed to be for jokes, but legit, I assume that a naked Mitch McConnell looks like the nudist alien scammers from futurama.

https://futurama.fandom.com/wiki/Sprunjer?file=Srunger.png

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic s... by stametseater on Monday March 27, 2023 @10:20AM (#35326996)
Or Dana Carvey trying to get into the Turtle Club.
[ Parent | on HN ]