Re:Apple’s 100 highest-ranking executives saw the VR headset...
by anonymouse008 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @12:32PM
(#35316340)
Let's put it in these terms:
The number of Apple customers from iPod that transitioned to iPhone was x%,
The number of iPhone to AirPods was y%
The number of iPhone to Watch was z%
z < y
z < x
in a cumulative measure from a time frame of 3 years from launch. Defining the proportion of current customers to converted sales is where one can play words with defining luck vs. skill vs. rent-seeking. If you have billions units and only convert 20% vs. other products that convert 75%, then maybe one is considered inferior to the other - and to which I confer the title of luck.
Now the fun question would be if x < y or the other way around.
The number of Apple customers from iPod that transitioned to iPhone was x%,
The number of iPhone to AirPods was y%
The number of iPhone to Watch was z%
z < y
z < x
in a cumulative measure from a time frame of 3 years from launch. Defining the proportion of current customers to converted sales is where one can play words with defining luck vs. skill vs. rent-seeking. If you have billions units and only convert 20% vs. other products that convert 75%, then maybe one is considered inferior to the other - and to which I confer the title of luck.
Now the fun question would be if x < y or the other way around.