Re:LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
by leobg on Saturday March 25, 2023 @02:39PM
(#35305643)
Thanks for the clarification. Does that mean then that when parallelization is not important, training an adapter might be just as good as or better than LoRA?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
by edwardjhu on Saturday March 25, 2023 @06:11PM
(#35307993)
If latency is irrelevant, I don't think there is a strong practical reason to prefer one over another. (LoRA is more elegant in my biased opinion because you roughly recover finetuning with a large r.) In practice, you see one do a little better on some tasks and vice versa on others as observed by papers after mine.