News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comparing Hobby PCB Vendors by mecsred on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:43PM (#35304390)
"Is it worth" is entirely subjective, I don't think someone who's happy with perf board particularly cares about RF performance or routing complex BGAs against the increased complexity of debugging a multi layer design. In general I would think that if you aren't sure you need a multilayer board, you probably don't.
Re:Comparing Hobby PCB Vendors by riceart on Saturday March 25, 2023 @01:15PM (#35304773)
But it was the original asker that brought up aesthetics - apparently unaware that it has nothing to do with it - it’s not subjective (more generally the concepts of worth and value are not “entirely” subjective, that’s ridiculous) - there are strictly more things you can do with a PCB. You can’t design high speed and/or highly integrated designs with perfboard (unless you limit yourself to the few parts available on carrier boards).
Re:Comparing Hobby PCB Vendors by the__alchemist on Saturday March 25, 2023 @04:15PM (#35306812)
The more layers, the easier to design IMO. You have to do more QC when placing a via, and there's more layers in general to flip between, but routing puzzles become easier.
Re:Comparing Hobby PCB Vendors by mecsred on Sunday March 26, 2023 @10:24PM (#35322188)
I find having access to traces to cut and probe to be a lot more important for hobby projects (that usually don't go through a simulation first). Routing is a very simple exercise below RF. YMMV though, exact application and goal probably matters more for this discussion.