News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by cbozeman on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:37PM (#35304326)
Even in the 1970s, women had condoms and birth control pills.

You're going to be hard-pressed to find a reasonable, thinking individual who would not allow for abortion exemptions for rape / incest / endangerment of the mother.

We're on Hacker News. A place where - supposedly - thinking people comment.

You "Don't be that guy."

It shouldn't even be necessary for me to have had to type this.

Re:Judge Decides Against Internet Archive by dahart on Saturday March 25, 2023 @01:52PM (#35305152)
It’s not hard at all to find examples counter to your claim. In Alabama “there are no exceptions for rape or incest”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Alabama

If you’re argument hinges on “reasonable, thinking” individuals, and you’re claiming that Alabama law didn’t meet that standard, then I would argue your “thinking” standard is completely irrelevant. The only relevant criteria is what makes it into law and affects people.