Re:US teens say they have new proof for 2k-year-old mathemat...
by saeranv on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:08PM
(#35304027)
Which is good! They're backing that claim by submitting it for peer review. It may seem like they're leapfrogging the process by getting published in the Guardian before getting validation but:
a. The Guardian is promoting them, not the students themselves, I believe.
b. It's genuinely impressive that high school students worked out a proof, (for something so common like the Pythagoreas theorem!) that wasn't immediately rejected on first sight by professionals. Even if is eventually rejected, getting to this point is worth noting and appreciating.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US teens say they have new proof for 2k-year-old mathemat...
by palata on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:26PM
(#35304197)
Oh that's the bit I was missing: so professionals did see the proof and did not reject it right away, is that right?
It was not clear to me if they just submitted their work or actually presented it already.
Re:US teens say they have new proof for 2k-year-old mathemat...
by CaptainNegative on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:27PM
(#35304214)
Do undergraduate mathematics journals ever desk-reject sincere attempts?