News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT and Wolfram Is Insane by Last5Digits on Friday March 24, 2023 @06:34PM (#35296597)
The dissertation part was in reference to the totality of your suggested improvements.

To me, even this clarification would be irrelevant. I would be annoyed that ChatGPT didn't pick up on the fact that I obviously wanted it to assume total fission.

But that is of course just my perspective. Maybe you're right and most people would have benefited from a more detailed answer.

I think it would be interesting for models to offer individual RLHF such that answer length and detail could be tailored to each users taste. Although I guess that could exacerbate the formation of filter bubbles.

There are no comments on this comment yet.