Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as Google sees a decline

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by cutemonster on Friday March 24, 2023 @05:19PM (#35295696)

I wonder if AI search could be sth consumers would happily pay a tiny bit for

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by danielbln on Friday March 24, 2023 @07:23PM (#35297050)

They wouldn't pay for AI search, but might for AI that also searches.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by anonylizard on Friday March 24, 2023 @08:24PM (#35297584)

I don't get where this "Everything must be free+ads' mentality comes from. Netflix thrived for a decade using subscriptions, Microsoft and Apple's businesses are primarily subscription based.

AIs are so extremely useful to some users, that they'll gladly pay $$ per month to use it. And the size of 'some' increases radically with each leap in AI's capabilities.

GPTs don't have to be gimped to just search. Even GPT-4 today with wolfram alpha can obliterate most low-level tutors. It will be a personal tutor, therapist, coding assistant, secretary, storyteller, entertainer all in one very soon. People will pay for it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by sizzle on Saturday March 25, 2023 @12:20AM (#35299336)

sth?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by ukuina on Saturday March 25, 2023 @01:19AM (#35299705)

"Something", perhaps.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by cutemonster on Saturday March 25, 2023 @05:47PM (#35307783)

Yes :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]