Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as Google sees a decline

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by myko on Friday March 24, 2023 @04:58PM (#35295386)

The response speed of Bard is much better in my experimentation. The creativity of the output on Bard is lacking, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by kif on Friday March 24, 2023 @05:24PM (#35295771)

I've found Bard to be very responsive too. Though you could argue it's not getting the same amount of traffic ChatGPT is.

That said, I don't expect Google to rest on its laurels. Sure, OpenAI is executing swiftly these days, but I think they've been prepared far too long for this. I expect Bard to become much better very soon... then will the AI wars truly begin.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by dmix on Friday March 24, 2023 @05:21PM (#35295733)

That's good to hear. I was concerned it might just be a hard limitation in the early days, tech wise.

Can Bard output quality code like GPT? I'm in Canada so couldn't use Bard sadly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing sees 15.8% boost in visits following GPT-4 push, as ... by kif on Friday March 24, 2023 @05:35PM (#35295916)

If you ask it to "write code to do X", then it will say that it can't write code. I think this was hardcoded.

But I asked Bard: "Can you implement fibonacci in Go", and it outputted valid code. And then I asked it "what if I wanted to avoid recursion", to which it replied with valid Go code that used a for loop. But it also suggested me another very bogus way of doing it, by using a "function pointer", which was very bad. F(x) would output x.

So, don't expect ChatGPT level of quality just yet, but I think it will get there pretty fast.

[ Parent | on HN ]