Re:Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open...
by dwallin on Friday March 24, 2023 @01:37PM
(#35292689)
Essentially every model worth anything has been trained on a unfathomably large amount of data under copyright, with every possible licensing scheme you could imagine, under the assumption that it is fair use. While you can argue that it's all built on a house of cards (and a court may well agree with you) it's kind of arbitrary to draw a line here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open...
by Taek on Friday March 24, 2023 @02:22PM
(#35293412)
Fair use via "this is completely impossible to regulate so you might as well embrace it"
Re:Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open...
by judge2020 on Friday March 24, 2023 @02:38PM
(#35293594)
> under the assumption that it is fair use.
No, because you as a human looking at "art" over your lifetime and learning from it is not "fair use" of the copyright, it's no-use at all. This is the crux of every argument for both for language models and AI Art models, that their tools are learning how to draw, learning what styles and characteristics of input art correspond the most with words, and creating art with that knowledge just like any other human, not simply collaging together different pieces of art.