Humans have reclaimed ‘land size of Luxembourg’ since 2000

Re:Humans have reclaimed ‘land size of Luxembourg’ since 2000 by e7beca0d on Friday March 24, 2023 @05:52AM (#35287001)

It doesn't mean that the journal exists, the study exists, or the numbers have any meaning. Posts like this are completely inappropriate.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Humans have reclaimed ‘land size of Luxembourg’ since 2000 by markdown on Friday March 24, 2023 @06:17AM (#35287150)

I mean, it's not hard to find: https://www.nature.com/search?q=earth%20has%20lost&journal=n...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Humans have reclaimed ‘land size of Luxembourg’ since 2000 by CatWChainsaw on Friday March 24, 2023 @06:22AM (#35287179)

Then why even bother asking a hallucination-prone LLM? It's not funny, it's not a flex, it's not even r/iamverysmart, it's just annoying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Humans have reclaimed ‘land size of Luxembourg’ since 2000 by yosito on Friday March 24, 2023 @06:52AM (#35287382)

The study does exist. Flagging me for posting a helpful and interesting comment isn't really appropriate.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Humans have reclaimed ‘land size of Luxembourg’ since 2000 by e7beca0d on Friday March 24, 2023 @08:21AM (#35288072)

I didn't flag anything, sorry for the drama, but at this point it would be good to provide a link, DOI, authors, title, ... . ChatGPT citations are notoriously unreliable.

I just asked it the same question, and it provided a different answer, and a study that can't be found in google.

[ Parent | on HN ]