News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by flangola7 on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @02:28PM (#35250381)
ChatGPT trained on my GitHub code and I wasn't paid anything at all. Is that preferable?
Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @02:55PM (#35250800)
"Since someone screwed me, they should screw you"? Crab bucket mentality?
Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by flangola7 on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @08:37PM (#35255021)
No one is screwing anyone. I also learned from reading GitHub code and continue to do so. I haven't "screwed" the original code authors by forming an abstract memory of their code.

Any country that tries to forbid this will be torpedoing their economic competitiveness against countries that allow it.

Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by xbar on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @11:25PM (#35256427)
This is a common fallacious argument.
Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by flangola7 on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @06:21PM (#35267828)
What is "this" ?
Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by krisoft on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @03:18PM (#35251152)
> Is that preferable?

I don’t see why you are asking this. Which part of my comment made you think it is preferable?

Re:Adobe Firefly: AI Art Generator by jacobr1 on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @03:56PM (#35251652)
It might also be wrong, yes. I have plenty of code licensed under very permissive licenses that still requires attribution. It is an open question of how much the AI system is a "derived" work in a specific, technical sense. And it probably will remain hard, since the answer is probably on a continuum.