The genie escapes: Stanford copies the ChatGPT AI for less than $600

Re:The genie escapes: Stanford copies the ChatGPT AI for les... by layer8 on Monday March 20, 2023 @05:30PM (#35239055)

Running isn’t necessarily the issue. The moat is creating a high-quality model like OpenAI has, which (and here the article is mistaken) doesn’t seem to be easily reproducible.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The genie escapes: Stanford copies the ChatGPT AI for les... by crooked-v on Monday March 20, 2023 @05:40PM (#35239174)

While that's true, it also seems entirely predictable at this point how to do that. It takes a lot of effort and expensive hardware, but there isn't really a "secret sauce" beyond expertise in the field.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The genie escapes: Stanford copies the ChatGPT AI for les... by layer8 on Monday March 20, 2023 @05:53PM (#35239313)

Yes, but it takes time (took OpenAI years) and significant effort. Who with enough expertise will do this and not keep the results closed in order to monetize them? It doesn’t seem like something an open source project could accomplish quickly enough to not keep lagging substantially behind the commercial solutions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The genie escapes: Stanford copies the ChatGPT AI for les... by twblalock on Monday March 20, 2023 @05:43PM (#35239206)

That's going to get easier too. Stanford can already get this far for $600, so soon after the major GPT-based chat AIs were released. Imagine how much better it will get with just a little bit more time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The genie escapes: Stanford copies the ChatGPT AI for les... by drowsspa on Monday March 20, 2023 @05:59PM (#35239378)

Sounds like IBM trusting no one would copy their BIOS code.

[ Parent | on HN ]