News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by MisterBastahrd on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:27PM (#35234047)
If you want to rein in behavior of police officers, then (a) don't allow offenses to be time-barred against retirement, and (b) pay victims out of their pension funds.

I think you'll find that this entire "protect the blue" bullshit that cops have to cover for each other will go out the window when their material interests are in jeopardy.

Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by eli on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:44PM (#35234369)
You don't need to make complicated special rules for going after police. You just need to remove some of the existing special rules that protect them.

If you can sue a doctor for malpractice you should be able to sue a police officer too.

Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by vimax on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:45PM (#35234388)
I don’t think (b) will work. The Dallas police pension fund is currently $3b in the red, how will they pay anything?
Re:Supreme Court Asked to Strike Down Immunity for Police Wh... by SauciestGNU on Monday March 20, 2023 @05:13PM (#35238829)
Presumably "in the red" here means it's underfunded with respect to meeting existing pension obligations, not that the fund has a literal negative balance. If I'm wrong then please disregard the second part of this comment.

The idea is collective punishment. Settlements would make the pension fund deeper in the red, meaning cops wouldn't get their promised pensions due to the actions of the abusive cops who caused the settlement payouts.

The hope is that the threat of losing your retirement security because your coworker fucks up is enough to break the thin blue line and cause cops to police themselves.