News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P... by pwinnski on Monday March 20, 2023 @11:33AM (#35233085)
I had an extended back-and-forth in which I asked ChatGPT how to undo mistakenly marking a message as junk in Messages on iOS.

It gave me a 7-step answer that was completely wrong. Then I said no, you can't do that, it apologized and gave me an 8-step answer that was completely wrong. When I pointed out in this case there is no "Junk" folder in iOS Messages, it apologized for the confusion and gave me another 8-step answer that was completely wrong. When I pointed out why that one wouldn't work, it gave up and said recovery was impossible and that I would need to contact the sender to re-send, and be more careful when marking messages as junk. This was still wrong, as recovery is possible, just not by any of the means it described.

So yeah, I have been super-impressed by the quality of output from these LLMs, but I cannot imagine actually relying on one for anything where correctness matters.

Giving me a nice list of Korean shoegaze bands, sure. Its step-by-step for how to become a better volleyball player will be great for my daughter, and was better than the answer to the same question from Google. But correctness? No.

There are no comments on this comment yet.