Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P...
by BurningFrog on Monday March 20, 2023 @08:17AM
(#35230432)
Humans are also "black boxes" we don't fully understand. It's worked pretty well.
Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P...
by shanebellone on Monday March 20, 2023 @08:39AM
(#35230635)
This is a shallow counterargument that entirely misses the point.
Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P...
by BurningFrog on Monday March 20, 2023 @10:26AM
(#35231951)
This is not even an argument, only a disagreement.
Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P...
by shanebellone on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:01PM
(#35233565)
"This is not even an argument, only a disagreement."
It's a straw man.
The need for transparency in process is known, documented, and undisputed. Your comment has no relevance. My brain might be a black box, but I can still communicate and/or document the specifics of a process.
Can [insert your preferred model] do that? Didn't think so.
Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P...
by tracker1 on Monday March 20, 2023 @11:06AM
(#35232568)
Given the changes in health over the past century and a half as we've adopted "science" into food, I'm not sure that I agree.
Re:GPTs Are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact P...
by auggierose on Monday March 20, 2023 @09:24AM
(#35231137)
Yes, in many situations it is important that we get AIs to explain how they came up
with a result, and that we are confident in the correctness of the explanation.
That is probably the most interesting thing you can work on now. Is that a sideshow? I don't think so, although I wouldn't mind that at all.
This is exactly the problem with AI. For business or government, the answer is as important as the methodology employed. A black box does not work for the majority of use cases.
Until it can show its work, it's a sideshow.