News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SETI@home Is in Hibernation by ETH_start on Saturday March 18, 2023 @05:18AM (#35207517)
I'm guessing much of that delivery cost is due to the additional energy transmission and storage infrastructure needed to incorporate intermittent energy from solar/wind.

Solar and wind are extremely expensive when all costs are taken into account. One study found that the "true cost of using wind and solar to meet demand was $272 and $472 per MWh": [pdf]https://web.archive.org/web/20220916003958/https://files.ame...

Mind you, this could change if we get an economical way to generate hydrocarbon fuels from renewable electricity, so I'm certainly not pessimistic about solar/wind's long term prospects.

Re:SETI@home Is in Hibernation by Symbiote on Saturday March 18, 2023 @05:43AM (#35207626)
With articles like "Save North Dakota Oil and Gas!" I'm sceptical of that study.

Wind and solar were 30% of Great Britain's electricity last year. The National Grid is a private company, so their costs are clear, 3% of the average bill.

Re:SETI@home Is in Hibernation by ETH_start on Sunday March 19, 2023 @03:46AM (#35216913)
The study advocates nuclear and hydroelectric as the means of getting to zero-carbon, so doesn't seem motivated by pro oil/gas bias.