Edit: Hee-hee! And if I put my source into Godbolt's Compiler Explorer, compile with gcc 12.2 -O3 -ffast-math then my program turns into:
main:
xor eax, eax
ret(Speaking of fast math, my planned blog post title if I ever write all this up into a blog post is "Floating Point, or How I Learned to Start Worrying and Hate Fast Math.")
More precisely, my test compared the bit-patterns directly:
i = 0 .. 2^32-1
memcpy(&x, &i, 4);
y = x + 0.0f;
memcpy(&j, &y, 4)
if (i != j) {printf("%f + 0.0 -> %f\n", x, y);
Regarding fast-not-so-math - Praise Kahan!
"it be complicated"
Except for certain operations (fneg, fcopysign, and fabs are all defined to only affect the sign bit, to the point that they're an exception to the sNaN-always-signals rule; and there are a few operations defined to operate on the NaN payload information), IEEE 754 generally says no more than a qNaN is generated. There's a recommendation that NaN payloads propagate, and most hardware does do that, but compilers actually typically don't even guarantee that sNaNs are not produced by operations.
I looked more closely, and yes, the signalling NaN + 0.0 always changed the bit pattern, and the quiet NaN + 0.0 always stayed the same.
Thank you for your informative details about IEEE 754.
The strict model requires that everything be evaluated at runtime and that the optimizer be aware of the potential for floating-point operations to have interactions with floating-point control and status words (i.e., rounding modes and fp exceptions)--essentially all optimizations are floating-point are forbidden.
The precise model allows compilers to ignore the dependency on rounding mode and fp exceptions, and treat floating-point optimizations as side-effect-free pure expressions, but still requires them to generally follow IEEE 754 arithmetic. As such, standard optimizations like code motion or constant propagation are legal, but arithmetic optimizations (like replacing x + 0.0 with x) are not generally legal.
The fast model allows compilers to also apply the arithmetic optimizations.
Most people who actually care about this level of detail are aware of the panoply of compiler options that are used to control floating-point optimization in the compiler.