We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training data

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by kaoD on Thursday March 16, 2023 @04:38PM (#35188177)

> Is that enough for you, or are you going to continue pushing false slippery slopes?

You misunderstood. I was not trying to portray your argument as a slippery slope. I was trying to portray your argument as just generally weak, which it obviously was ("but china" is not even an argument). Given that you completely misunderstood my point, the rest of your comment doesn't even apply.

That you had to resort to subtly calling me an idiot says a lot.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by rglullis on Thursday March 16, 2023 @05:06PM (#35188633)

My anecdote about Huawei "stealing IP" was just that, an anecdote. It was meant as a counterpoint against your "copyright stops bad actors", not as the basis of an argument against copyright in itself.

> That you had to resort to subtly calling me an idiot says a lot.

That you didn't mind me subtly calling you dishonest says even more, and shows that I'm done here.

[ Parent | on HN ]