News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TypeScript 5.0 by wnolens on Thursday March 16, 2023 @03:48PM (#35187363)
I feel the same, but when I complain I get blamed. Or someone chimes in with an illegible type/interface definition that solves my issue but is completely out of reach for all but language experts, which in other languages is not an issue.
Re:TypeScript 5.0 by eropple on Thursday March 16, 2023 @07:22PM (#35190367)
Can you provide an example of something you'd see in common use that is 1) not provided by an existing library (such that you are consuming a complex type rather than writing it) and is 2) "out of reach for all but language experts"?