Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by bayindirh on Thursday March 16, 2023 @08:53AM
(#35181224)
Digikam is the bees knees in digital asset management. I manage my personal photo archive with that, and it punches way above its weight.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by magicalhippo on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:40AM
(#35181826)
* * *
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by foobarbecue on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:00AM
(#35181310)
"knees bees" ... maybe I'm missing a joke, but I always said "bees knees" in this context as a play on "business"
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by bayindirh on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:03AM
(#35181339)
Fixed it, thanks. Sometimes my mind to finger interface changes packets on the way. I guess my nervous system uses UDP.
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by Aromasin on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:08AM
(#35181420)
You're alone not :-)
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by LMMojo on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:04AM
(#35181361)
"Bee's Knees" == absolutely the best
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by foobarbecue on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:18AM
(#35181540)
but is it better than the dog's bollocks?
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by BLKNSLVR on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:59AM
(#35182052)
Nothing beats the duck's nuts
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by raffraffraff on Thursday March 16, 2023 @10:42AM
(#35182668)
Or the cat's whiskers
All from 1920s slang. Apart from dog's bollocks I imagine.
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by scrozier on Thursday March 16, 2023 @11:08AM
(#35182927)
I'm almost 65 and I never put "bee's knees" together with "business." And they say you can't teach an old dog....
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by tastemykungfu on Thursday March 16, 2023 @08:55AM
(#35181249)
Except for it's horrible face recognition right?.. ugh.
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by yread on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:08AM
(#35181421)
Latest release failed the tests (with some memory corruption yikes) even. Doesn't inspire a lot of confidence that it won't eat your photos.
But the v7 uses DNN from OpenCV for face detection that supposedly has 91% accuracy on CPLFW which is pretty good! So how come people here say it sucks?
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by bayindirh on Thursday March 16, 2023 @09:15AM
(#35181492)
Because many people test it once, and assume that since it's FOSS, the feature is not evolved over time.
Re:Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
by bayindirh on Thursday March 16, 2023 @08:56AM
(#35181259)
I'm away from my desktop computer, but it wasn't half bad when I last updated its DB. I don't take much portraits, so I don't use that feature much, but give it a look when I can and update you.