| |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
+---+---+---+
| |
| |
| | |
| | .
| | /
| | /
+-----------+-+
"Considering the hint that the image is part of a human being and the diagonal line is similar to the vertical lines, it appears that the image might represent a hand, specifically an open hand with fingers splayed out. The vertical lines represent the fingers, and the diagonal line represents the thumb, which is extending out at an angle from the square (representing the palm of the hand). The image is a 2D, stylized representation of a human hand.
With the provided hints and context, the interpretation of the ASCII art as a hand seems more plausible. If you have more hints or information, please share them, and I'll be happy to refine the interpretation further if necessary."
This technology appears to show great promise, but is clearly still in its infancy.
| |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
+---+---+---+
| |
| |
| | |
| | .
| | /
| | /
+-----------+-+
...
Uh oh.
>> For a human, that is all that's needed to recognise a hand, i.e.
Blast it! Cover blown.
:poof:
But on the other hand, just like open world was a terrible curse with hundred of games feeling empty, I'm afraid we will see a wave of games with a lot of generated but eventually uninteresting content because this is so easy to do.
After all, good content is coherent, and filtered. It's not just about producing a lot, it's what you don't put in the game, and what you do to glue things together.
I sure GPT will eventually be better at it than humans, but for now, having a human veto is necessary to have a good noise/signal ratio and because GPT is "good enough", being lazy is tempting.
But yeah, I can confirm GPT4 is already quite good at it and will only improve from this point.
This is going to be very interesting years.