Would love to know all of the unbiased information whenever this type of post happens.
@op the obvious question - what were you doing with the account?
Geez... Let's let the guy have some privacy. Whatever happened to presuming innocence?
If OP is in the wrong, no advice we give is going to get them out of it, but if they're in the right, we might be able to help them. Trying to find fault in OP seems pointless.
I am not forcing him to answer and I will of course respect the decision if he doesn't want to lmao.
I realise you're proving a point rather than this being relevant so cba typing any further, here ya go https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35016037
This was telegraphed so it was indeed irrelevant to try to illustrate that point.
No.. I do not believe that because I would do something it means everyone should do the same. What an odd conclusion!
I had the option to respond or not, I decided to do so.
private individuals can presume whatever they want to presume.
it is only the state that has to presume your innocence.
Unfortunately I have no idea where you'd go from here with this new information and nobody else is around anymore.
that's how you get exploited by sociopaths in your personal life.
I am tired of banks and other companies hiding behind this excuse. The banks lobbied for that, they want that gag order. They want to be able to hide behind that regulation so they do not ever have to provide actual answers to why they banned someone or closed an account
Stripe employees have commented on HN about this behavior as it occurs frequently. That behavior being an account with no history whining about how some big evil bank attacked them, a poor powerless innocent victim, for absolutely no reason. Almost always the account is closed due to fraud only after several rounds of correspondence and whining about it on HN is some last ditch effort to garner sympathy or shame the financial institution while the financial institution is legally prevented from public comment.