News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPT-4. Parent comment

Re:GPT-4 by Hoyadonis on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @03:21AM (#35164977)
Of all the areas Silicon Valley has disrupted, it's profoundly frustrating that political lobbying isn't one of them. I'm not aware of any startups even attempting it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by xenostar on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @04:57AM (#35165601)
How exactly would they disrupt it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by Laaas on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @05:11AM (#35165672)
Make it available to the public. Have a service where people can come together to decide what to lobby for.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by adam-a on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @06:58AM (#35166323)
If only there was some way every member of the public could have a say in political decisions. Hopefully one of those clever startups figures it out.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by liamwire on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @07:02AM (#35166357)
Introducing, Representr: the first Democracy-as-a Service.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 by glenneroo on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @05:45PM (#35175151)
Someone posted this earlier from Schneier on Security but it didn't get much traction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35162918

"AI Could Write Our Laws"

I didn't read it fully (yet) but early on he (I believe) coins the term "microlegislation".

[ Parent | on HN ]