Re:40% of the code GitHub Copilot users check-in is AI gener...
by jaredcwhite on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:58AM
(#35164822)
Indeed you are not. I've never used any generative AI tools when coding or otherwise, and continue to refuse to at this point in time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:40% of the code GitHub Copilot users check-in is AI gener...
by ashwagary on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @08:20AM
(#35167143)
>I've never used any generative AI tools when coding or otherwise
I'm in the same boat but I must admit the temptation is increasing.
Re:40% of the code GitHub Copilot users check-in is AI gener...
by adlpz on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @03:31PM
(#35173528)
I understand not doing it, just because you didn't get around to try it, but, refusing? why? Moral reasons? Copyright worries?
It's just another tool. So I guess the good old "will never stop using emacs" kind of attitude applies here too?
Re:40% of the code GitHub Copilot users check-in is AI gener...
by Zuiii on Thursday March 16, 2023 @11:01PM
(#35192444)
I never relied on code-completion (not even copilot). I found that coworkers who do simply can't function without it. They simply find it very difficult or even impossible to remember more than a few API names, parameters, etc. I still remember the constant complaints in the early days of Rust when code completion was not available or would constantly break.
Relying on code-completion for coding or relying on google maps for navigation dims your ability to do these things. Given that copilot is a remote service that I do not control, I will not voluntarily tie my ability to write software to it.
Coilot is a conditional, unreliable, untrustworthy, ability-as-a-service. No thank you.