We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training data

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by emodendroket on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @01:52AM (#35164414)

That’s not true. You can just read something else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by matheusmoreira on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @01:58AM (#35164463)

I didn't say copyright holders had a monopoly on reading though. I said they had monopolies on "their" works.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by emodendroket on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @02:15AM (#35164571)

Then the concept is meaningless. If we go with your definition, Toyota now has a "monopoly" on Toyota Camrys, even though there are quite a few comparable cars for sale from other manufacturers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by realusername on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @03:14AM (#35164935)

How much of the common culture is free from copyright and how much belongs to megacorps? It's really a monopoly

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by emodendroket on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @10:59AM (#35169344)

Quite a lot of books or characters I’d expect most people to recognize are in the public domain, to be honest.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by carom on Thursday March 16, 2023 @12:00AM (#35178000)

Do you not have a monopoly on your work?

[ Parent | on HN ]