News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training data. Parent comment

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by misssocrates on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @10:59PM (#35163201)
Predictions on how it's going to come back to bite them?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by evdubs on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @12:40AM (#35163961)
5% chance the copyright industry will sue AI companies for verbatim reproduction of copyrighted works.

0.1% chance the Feds get involved and sue AI companies for criminal copyright infringement.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by petesergeant on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @01:42AM (#35164356)
If you can induce ChatGPT to repeat a copyright work, I wonder if that’s definitive proof of copyright infringement.

It has no problem reproducing song lyrics for me, which I’m pretty sure are absolutely copyright. Interestingly, it’ll start to reproduce a famous book for me, and then cut off in such a way as to suggest there’s a hard filter to stop it proceeding

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by precompute on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @06:02AM (#35165926)
It will not bite them back, because they will argue that what was put in the dataset was "easy" and not worthy of copyright anyway. Then, they'll tout how smart their "AI" is. Two birds with one stone.
[ Parent | on HN ]