News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-4 by eep_social on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:19PM (#35161735)
> a full-self-driving tesla

Sorry for the derail, but this does not exist and yet this is the second time today I’ve seen it used as a benchmark for what is possible. Would you care to say more?

Re:GPT-4 by Hasnep on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:48PM (#35162064)
Seems like a pretty apt analogy. People want to use LLMs like a fully self-driving Tesla, but the "self-driving Tesla" version of LLMs doesn't exist either.
Re:GPT-4 by eep_social on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @11:18PM (#35163358)
touché, though I doubt the gp meant it that way