Re:Ask HN: What is a good introduction to neuroscience?
by robg on Sunday November 02, 2008 @12:44PM
(#351507)
Upvote for Kandell, not BioPsych. The latter just emphasizes the wrong things and too broadly.
Re:Ask HN: What is a good introduction to neuroscience?
by jackchristopher on Sunday November 02, 2008 @03:05PM
(#351606)
What about MITECS? [1] Is it outdated?
Eliezer Yudkowsky recommended it[2]. But I'm not sure if he still would.
I know you work at MIT, what do you use?
[1] http://www.amazon.com/MIT-Encyclopedia-Cognitive-Sciences-MI...
Re:Ask HN: What is a good introduction to neuroscience?
by robg on Sunday November 02, 2008 @03:13PM
(#351611)
That's just a reference volume. It's fine for what it is, but really as a launching off point for specific topics. And reading it cover to cover would get old, fast.
Re:Ask HN: What is a good introduction to neuroscience?
by sgrove on Sunday November 02, 2008 @02:39PM
(#351579)
I'd second principles of neural science, though that's with the expectation that the reader has the appropriate background in basic chemistry, biology, and maybe anatomy. Out of the dozens of books I have on neurosci, that's probably the single most comprehensive.
http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Neural-Science-Eric-Kandel/...
If you're looking for something a bit more digestable, you could try "Biological Psychology: An Introduction to Behavioral, Cognitive, and Clinical Neuroscience", which is more appropriate for a survey level (100, 1000, depending on your school) course.
http://www.amazon.com/Biological-Psychology-Introduction-Beh...