News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux Package Manager Command Line Comparison by nicktelford on Thursday January 26, 2012 @09:53AM (#3514344)
The biggest advantage is when removing packages; its dependency resolution is (supposedly) much better so it's able to find and remove orphan packages more accurately without hosing your system.

It's also got a much friendlier set of commands:

  $ apt-get upgrade vim # aptitude upgrade vim

  $ apt-get dist-upgrade # aptitude full-upgrade

  $ apt-cache search # aptitude search

  $ apt-get install --reinstall vim # aptitude reinstall vim

  $ apt-get remove --purge vim # aptitude purge vim
The list goes on.

It's also got an awesome ncurses based interactive interface if you just type:

  $ aptitude
Great for sysadmins who miss synaptic or anyone who feels like a GUI is just too mainstream.
Re:Linux Package Manager Command Line Comparison by ernesth on Thursday January 26, 2012 @10:19AM (#3514436)
apt-get also is able to remove orphaned libraries.

Among other "advantages" of aptitude, it can be terribly slower than apt-get. And it has a "smart" dependency engine that often proposes convoluted solutions (involving uninstalling packages I don't want uninstalled) when apt-get will simply update the dependency and their dependents... But at least, if you don't agree with the first solutions, it has others (sometimes including the one apt-get chooses).

Re:Linux Package Manager Command Line Comparison by bostonvaulter2 on Thursday January 26, 2012 @02:01PM (#3515429)
What's the history of the aptitude and apt-* family of commands? Why do they both exist?
Re:Linux Package Manager Command Line Comparison by sciurus on Thursday January 26, 2012 @02:17PM (#3515508)