Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python

Re:Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python by pplante on Monday March 13, 2023 @01:08PM (#35138772)

At first I was very skeptical, but after looking further at the examples I feel like you pretty much nailed the developer experience. I have not used this yet but I will definitely check it out.

Is there a roadmap? I see the GitHub project board is pretty focused on v0.1.20. I am curious what are your plans for client side code via wasm? I feel like that is a critical missing piece for me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python by picklelo on Monday March 13, 2023 @01:28PM (#35139153)

Thanks! We're using GH Projects for everything, we will update the board with a more long-term roadmap. Python support for wasm isn't where we need it yet, but we definitely want to integrate it when it's ready.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python by pplante on Monday March 13, 2023 @02:41PM (#35140398)

What do you think is missing?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python by apetuskey on Monday March 13, 2023 @03:39PM (#35141282)

I think a big thing is the limited supported libraries as of now.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python by beepbooptheory on Monday March 13, 2023 @05:57PM (#35143520)

Isn't also just the fact you need to send over like 7MB of wasm for even just the standard library?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Launch HN: Pynecone (YC W23) – Web Apps in Pure Python by ttul on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:05AM (#35147640)

Presumably you could optimize that by analyzing a running site and stripping out the unnecessary libraries. I'm sure that will come with time.

[ Parent | on HN ]