Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by jurassic on Sunday March 12, 2023 @08:58PM
(#35129094)
SVB shareholders have been wiped out in this, and the prospect of that fate should motivate banks to try to avoid a similar outcome for their institutions going forward.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by jongjong on Sunday March 12, 2023 @11:44PM
(#35130731)
It depends. It's likely that some of those big SVB shareholders were also shareholders of ventures which had deposits at SVB so they got punished and bailed out at the same time... Less punishment. Maybe even profitable for them.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by selimthegrim on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:33PM
(#35129494)
They did pass tax on buybacks
Carried interest needs to be next
They could have kept deposits as cash and watched the value erode like a dumb retail consumer has an option to do. But that’d look bad for bank investors.
So now the Fed and Treasury are responsible for negative yield on bad bets if that account crosses 100B. Cool. I only have about 100B to go before the US government cares about my negative position. 401K takes an L because interest rate rises and the SP500 being a stock buyback circus. That’s on me I guess.
Anyone saying well it’s not using taxpayer dollars. Whatever, it is using our feds time. This whole thing is now J Powell and Yellen focusing on a cottage industry serving billionaire interests instead of using their time and agency to work for that dumb aforementioned retail consumer undergoing inflation and a pending recession.
In an agency where any intervention sets a precedent this is now telling regional banks to go ahead and yolo your balance sheet. We got you.
I want the startups to get their money through liquidation of the bank at whatever discount that comes to. 80c on the dollar, whatever it isn’t your money anyway it’s VC money. All savings accounts come with 250k FDIC insured. So play by those rules.