Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by lmm on Sunday March 12, 2023 @07:16PM
(#35127937)
The government can't generally arbitrarily seize an operating business. (Indeed, in the recent Johnson & Johnson court case we saw the opposite: they asked to undertake bankruptcy proceedings early because they're facing a large liability, the government said no, not until you're proven to be actually bankrupt)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by nullc on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:32PM
(#35129482)
Sounds like a bit of a hazard: the difference between insolvent or not for many entities is just accounting conventions. Lock in some non-MTM losses-- wham!-- insolvent.
Why should bankruptcy protection be denied to any entity that would be unquestionably qualified if they simply took an additional legitimate action that would make their creditors worse off?