Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by reso on Sunday March 12, 2023 @06:53PM
(#35127547)
I am also confused about where the money is coming from to cover SVB’s losses, if not from the taxpayer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by gruez on Sunday March 12, 2023 @07:00PM
(#35127661)
1. FDIC reserve fund (from the premiums they collect)
2. "a special assessment" aka a tax on member banks directly
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by dodgerdan on Sunday March 12, 2023 @07:04PM
(#35127733)
3. SVB’s assets. They actually have enough assets to pay, but it will take time for those bonds to mature.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by gruez on Sunday March 12, 2023 @07:11PM
(#35127836)
Having to wait for the bonds to mature is arguably a haircut. Otherwise you can for example, justify a 10% haircut by saying that you can take that 10%, buy some 5 year treasuries with it, and get back your money once those bonds mature.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by perryizgr8 on Monday March 13, 2023 @01:34AM
(#35131522)
> 2. "a special assessment" aka a tax on member banks directly
And if some bank doesn't have enough to cover everything they can get freshly printed USD courtesy of BTFP: https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-news-today-03-...