This also doesn't reflect on the fitness of the companies in question. If you're starting a software company, you should be able to go to the bank and it should Just Work. If it doesn't, that's the bank's fault, not yours. You shouldn't have to think about the average duration of the bank's bond portfolio, or about how many interest-rate swaps it has on the books. That responsibility and risk should go with the bank. That's their role.
Secondly, what a person or company thinks should happen bears no actual relation to what actually does happen. Why should we start giving credit to misconceptions? This is on par with someone arguing that it's ok to distribute copyrighted property for free because no one made any money on it and when confronted with the legal reality that the courts don't care, pleading, "but thats the way it should just work."
Sorry, but that's doesn't reflect the reality of the terms of the banking arrangement. Excesses of 250k are not insured.
There's a lot of things I think should just work, but using that as a justification is beyond logic.
No depositors lost a penny to bank failures in 07-08, or to any bank failures since 1933. If you had a billion dollars on deposit with Lehman, you got a billion dollars back. The lesson everyone has learned is that bank deposits are safe.
Which makes sense! Why should anyone with more than $250k have to become a bank analyst just to keep their money in a single account? It's not as if mid-sized businesses are going to hire CPAs to navigate this jungle. They'll just pick a giant bank, and we'll end up with a total of three banks in the whole country.
Everyone learned this during the collapse of banks in the mid 2000s. Everyone knows that holding accounts at multiple banks is a way around it.
This isn't something that's specific to businesses either - it applies to individual accounts the same. They took a risk by holding more than 250k in a single account and a risk isn't a risk if there's no chance of failure.
I can't stress this enough, but markets do better when agents have skin in the game. Commercial survival of the fittest requires failure.